Hi folks!
I wanted to get some thoughts on whether self-study is a good route for second time takers.
I took BarBri the first time around and still have all of my materials. Unfortunately, the time I committed to attending the lectures seriously hindered my ability to actually learn the substantive law (I'm originally from WV, graduated in 2006, and my LL.M studies didn't cover bar subjects).
I have a hard time learning anything in lectures and I am more than capable of making a study plan and sticking to it. I also learn best when I have the chance to read, process, and interpret the law at my own pace. I'm concerned, however, that I may not get adequate feedback as far as practice essays and practice MBE. I didn't practice very much of either my first time around, so most of my practice BarBri materials are untouched.
I plan on studying with my best friend, who is also taking the bar and invested $12,000 in a personal tutor. I have a mentor and former bar grader who has made it a personal goal to make sure I pass the next time around. I have an excellent support system, I've retained my self-respect and confidence, and I was close enough that I believe that I will pass next time so long as I practice and get a stronger grip on the law.
Is it practical to self-study? Is it really worth throwing more money at tutors and gurus who can offer little more than the materials and feedback I've already received? I don't really want to invest even more money in this, and after BarBri I'm concerned that the time I would commit to additional bar review courses and/or tutors wouldn't be as well spent as reviewing the materials I have, getting a better grip on the substantive law, and using the time to actually practice.
Category: CA - California Bar Exam
Reply With Quote