Study For the Bar Exam
Bar Exam Questions and Answers

Can someone provide some testable new CA bar exam civ pro or evidence issues?

This is a Question on "Can someone provide some testable new CA bar exam civ pro or evidence issues?"; Trying to get a feeling of the new subjects (California civil procedure and California evidence) Any predictions/discussion based on ...


Go Back   Study For the Bar Exam > Law
--- Register Now ---

Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark All Read
Old 10-14-2007   #1
rakhi
New
 
rakhi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 11
rakhi is new here, but building a  reputation
Can someone provide some testable new CA bar exam civ pro or evidence issues?

Trying to get a feeling of the new subjects (California civil procedure and California evidence) Any predictions/discussion based on the July 2007 appreciated.
rakhi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2007   #2
real
New
 
real's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 17
real is new here, but building a  reputation
Re: Can someone provide some testable new CA bar exam civ pro or evidence issues?

tips quoted from the baroutlines.com Ca bar exam outlines

1) Res judicata. Claim preclusion.



*CA follows the primary rights rule. there is a separate cause of action or claim for property damage and for personal injury, even if they were caused in a single transaction (because personal injury and property rights are different primary rights) (“primary rights” theory)



Example: P could sue the D for property damages caused by a car accident w/ the D and later sue D for his physical injuries. Primary rights involved here: Property right and right to recover for physical injuries.



There are a lot of issues in the outlines, that one struck me as very testable

For Evidence:

In Fed, evidence of subsequent remedial measures is not admissible due to public policy considerations. In CA, Evidence of subsequent remedial measures is admissible in products liability based on strict liability. May be admissible in criminal cases due to Prop. 8.

Best evidence rule is really really different. in * All evidence admissible unless there is a genuine dispute or admission would be unfair. Oral testimony about a writing is only permissible if both the writing and any copies are unavailable.

Hope it gives you a feel of what the differences are



Source:baroutlines.com
real is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2008   #3
carol
New
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 2
carol is new here, but building a  reputation
Re: Can someone provide some testable new CA bar exam civ pro or evidence issues?

California follows code pleading, so if you are on an essay that is asking about notice vs. code pleading (and even if you are in fed court) go ahead and make a quick mention on your exam that California follows code pleading. You will see notice and code pleading come up in one of those essays that asks about a summary judgment or motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim or insufficiency of the pleadings - i have seen examples of this already in the released answers in our class and the bar has picked essay answers that have these Cal distinctions made even before the they started actually testing it.
carol is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Tools Search
Search:

Advanced Search


Similar Threads

Question Question Asker Section Answers Last Post
Can I take the bar exam/be a lawyer without going to law school? steva Law 2 05-23-2008 05:50 PM
High Priced Bar Review Courses imgood Law 1 12-11-2007 06:51 PM
New california bar exam subject - civ pro, evidence, business association law10 Law 1 11-06-2007 05:28 PM
What You Need to Know About the 2009 CA Bar Exam studyfor Law 0 10-13-2007 11:55 PM
What You Need to Know About the 2009 Kansas Bar Exam studyfor Law 0 10-13-2007 11:55 PM


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:09 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.